<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:discourse="http://discourse.org/rss/modules/discourse/"><channel><title>V11.3 on DevBlog</title><link>/tags/v11.3/</link><description>Recent content in V11.3 on DevBlog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>A template by [Heksagon](https://www.heksagon.net). Implemented for [Critical Manufacturing](https://www.criticalmanufacturing.com/).</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/tags/v11.3/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Equipment Qualification in MES: A fundamental Control for Validated Manufacturing Environments. Part II</title><link>/blog/20260514-equipmentqualification_part_ii/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><dc:creator>Romeu Gonçalves</dc:creator><guid>/blog/20260514-equipmentqualification_part_ii/</guid><description>Qualify your equipment, capabilities, and processes whenever necessary</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog serves as a complement to the first one I published on the Equipment Qualification functionality: <a href="/blog/20260401-EquipmentQualification_Part_I">Equipment Qualification – Part I</a>. While the initial article introduced the fundamental concepts and the overall process logic, this new content dives deeper into additional aspects of the functionality, exploring another practical use case and more advanced configurations.</p>
<h3 id="additional-functionalities-in-equipment-qualification">Additional Functionalities in Equipment Qualification</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
In addition to the core process described in the first article, Equipment Qualification offers several advanced capabilities that enhance flexibility, operational control and allow us to use this functionality in more complex qualification scenarios.
<br><br>
<h3 id="1st-triggering-a-qualification-after-a-preventive-maintenance">1st) Triggering a Qualification After a Preventive Maintenance</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
An Adhoc qualification may also be automatically triggered upon completion of a maintenance activity. In such cases, the equipment will remain unavailable until the qualification result is “Pass”. This capability is extremely important following annual maintenance for instance, during which multiple components may be replaced and/or process recipes updated, etc.
</div>
<p>
<figure class="text-center">
  <img
    src="/blogPosts/posts/20260514_EquipmentQualification_Part_II/AnnualMaintenance.png"
    alt="Annual Maintenance with Qualification"
    title="Annual Maintenance with Qualification"
  />
  <figcaption style="text-align: center">Annual Maintenance with Qualification</figcaption>
</figure>

</p>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Alternatively, rather than triggering a qualification following a maintenance activity, it would also be possible to incorporate the maintenance tasks directly within the qualification process itself with all the known functionalities (Checklist, Data Collection, BOM, Certification, Documents, etc.)
</div>
<h3 id="2nd-compose-bom-to-create-material-on-the-fly">2nd) Compose BOM to Create Material on the Fly</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Assignment point is where Material assigned to the Qualification Procedure must be located. But what should be done if no qualification lot is available at that moment? Should we cancel the qualification until someone can create lots in the MES for this purpose? No! In these scenarios the system supports composing on the fly lots for this purpose. This allows users to dynamically generate the lots needed for the qualification without requiring preexisting master data setups.
Another option is to select a lot under an experiment to be sent to the assignment Step at the end of the experiment
</div>
<p>
<figure class="text-center">
  <img
    src="/blogPosts/posts/20260514_EquipmentQualification_Part_II/composemap.png"
    alt="Compose MAP"
    title="Compose MAP"
  />
  <figcaption style="text-align: center">Compose MAP</figcaption>
</figure>

</p>
<h3 id="3rd-run-at-risk">3rd) Run at Risk</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The “Run at Risk” option enables shop floor operations to process a predefined set of lots on equipment that is currently undergoing qualification. This functionality may be used only under exceptional circumstances, in which an authorized user or role with the required permission determines that specific lots may proceed under these conditions. Typical use cases include urgent lots or lots that are known in advance to present minimal risk and are expected to be automatically placed on hold at a subsequent process step, with an associated protocol assigned for further evaluation.
</div>
<h3 id="4th-minimum-quantity-and-unit-selection-for-lots">4th) Minimum Quantity and Unit Selection for Lots</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
When selecting lots for qualification, the system can ensure that a minimum quantity of units from the lot is provided to ensure that the qualification process is operationally valid. This control guarantees that the qualification is based on a sufficiently representative number of units. Additionally, users can choose whether the quantity is captured using the lot’s primary or secondary unit of measure, providing greater operational flexibility.
</div>
<h3 id="5th-skipping-result-verification">5th) Skipping Result Verification</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It is possible, under very specific conditions, to bypass result capture within a verification step
</div>
<h3 id="demo">⚙️DEMO</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Qualification is triggered after a complex maintenance Activity. During the qualification a Dummy lot must be created on the fly, and some productive lots will Run at Risk whilst the equipment is still under qualification
<br><br>
<p><u><b>MODELING</b></u></p>
<video class="video-shortcode" preload="auto" controls>
    <source src="/blogPosts/posts/20260514_EquipmentQualification_Part_II/EquipmentQualification2Setup.mp4" type="video/mp4">
    There should have been a video here but your browser does not seem
    to support it.
</video>
<p><br><br></p>
<p><u><b>EXECUTION</b></u></p>
<video class="video-shortcode" preload="auto" controls>
    <source src="/blogPosts/posts/20260514_EquipmentQualification_Part_II/EquipmentQualification2Execution.mp4" type="video/mp4">
    There should have been a video here but your browser does not seem
    to support it.
</video>
<h3 id="final-thoughts">Final thoughts</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The advanced capabilities of Equipment Qualification in CM MES make it easier to handle real-world manufacturing challenges. From triggering qualifications after maintenance to enabling controlled Run-at-Risk scenarios or creating material on the fly. These additional features ensure equipment remains compliant without slowing down operations too much. while still ensuring that equipment is properly checked and safe to use
<br><br>
<h3 id="author">Author</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Hi! My name is José Romeu Bogas Gonçalves. 😉
<p>I&rsquo;ve been with Critical Manufacturing since 2018, starting out as an MES Consultant. In 2025 I stepped into the Advocate &amp; Architecture team. My role sits at the intersection of technology, communication, and strategy. Making sure solutions are technically sound and that everyone understands how to use or build them.</p>
<p>You can check me on <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/romeu-gon%C3%A7alves-63724113/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">LinkedIn</a></p>
</div>
<p>Skills: MES Consultant | System Testing | System Modeling | User Training | Content Creating</p>
<p>
<figure class="text-center">
  <img
    src="/blogPosts/contributors/Blogger_Romeu.jpg"
    alt="Romeu Gonçalves"
    title="Architecture &amp; Advocacy | MES"
  />
  <figcaption style="text-align: center">Architecture &amp; Advocacy | MES</figcaption>
</figure>

</p>
]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Equipment Qualification in MES: A fundamental Control for Validated Manufacturing Environments. Part I</title><link>/blog/20260401-equipmentqualification_part_i/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><dc:creator>Romeu Gonçalves</dc:creator><guid>/blog/20260401-equipmentqualification_part_i/</guid><description>Qualify your equipment, capabilities, and processes whenever necessary</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: justify;">
This blog explains how equipment qualification can be modeled and controlled within CM MES V11.3 for validated manufacturing environments. In such contexts, equipment, related recipes, and service configurations must be requalified at defined intervals or unexpectedly to ensure continued compliance and operational reliability. Understanding how CM MES manages qualifications is essential for maintaining equipment readiness, preventing unqualified processing, and safeguarding overall production integrity
</div>
<br><br>
<h3 id="introduction">Introduction</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Equipment and their associated recipes and/or capabilities may require periodic or unscheduled requalification. This process differs from standard maintenance because it involves assigning, running, and validating a special type of lot, commonly known as a “dummy lot.”
In summary, an Equipment Qualification can be viewed as a Maintenance Activity Order (MAO) in which, during or upon completion of the maintenance activity, a “Dummy” lot must be processed to confirm that the equipment is properly qualified, much like a Send-Ahead-Run.
<p>The equipment, along with its recipes and capabilities, may require requalification under the following conditions:</p>
<ul>
<li>After processing a defined number of units</li>
<li>On a time-based schedule</li>
<li>After final installation and before being released for production use</li>
<li>Following engineering activities that may have resulted in recipe changes</li>
<li>After relocation within the facility</li>
<li>After unplanned downtime events</li>
<li>Etc.
<br><br></li>
</ul>
<h3 id="how-does-it-work-in-cm-mes-v113">How does it work in CM MES V11.3</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The figure below provides an overview of how this functionality operates within the CM MES
</div>
<p>
<figure class="text-center">
  <img
    src="/blogPosts/posts/20260401_EquipmentQualification_Part_I/Overview.png"
    alt="Qualification Workflow"
    title="Qualification Workflow"
  />
  <figcaption style="text-align: center">Qualification Workflow</figcaption>
</figure>

</p>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><u>Assignment Point</u></b>: The Flow Path where Material assigned to the Qualification Procedure must be located. Material Type must also be defined
<p>
<figure class="text-center">
  <img
    src="/blogPosts/posts/20260401_EquipmentQualification_Part_I/AssignmentPoint.png"
    alt="Assignment Point"
    title="Assignment Point"
  />
  <figcaption style="text-align: center">Assignment Point</figcaption>
</figure>

</p>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><u>Execution Point</u></b>: The Flow Path where Material assigned to the Qualification Procedure is processed in the equipment for which one of its items is being qualified (Equipment and/or sub-equipment and/or Equipment Recipe and/or Equipment Service). It is also necessary to define when the Qualification Item becomes unavailable for standard production operations
<p>
<figure class="text-center">
  <img
    src="/blogPosts/posts/20260401_EquipmentQualification_Part_I/AssignmentPoint.png"
    alt="Execution Point"
    title="Execution Point"
  />
  <figcaption style="text-align: center">Execution Point</figcaption>
</figure>

</p>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><u>Verification Point</u></b>: It consists of one or more Verification Flow Path in which a <b>“Pass”</b> or <b>“Fail”</b> result is recorded, along with the method used to capture that result
<p>
<figure class="text-center">
  <img
    src="/blogPosts/posts/20260401_EquipmentQualification_Part_I/VerificationPoint.png"
    alt="Verification Point"
    title="Verification Point"
  />
  <figcaption style="text-align: center">Verification Point</figcaption>
</figure>

</p>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If all Verification Points pass, the qualification is approved and the equipment and/or equipment-recipe and/or equipment-service is/are released for production.
If a Verification Point fails, equipment or recipe adjustments may be required, and after that a new dummy lot must be run to repeat the qualification
<p><br><br></p>
<h3 id="demo">⚙️DEMO</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Annual qualification of Wire Bonding equipment and of a designated critical process recipe, with 3 verification Steps
<br><br>
<p><u><b>MODELING</b></u></p>
<video class="video-shortcode" preload="auto" controls>
    <source src="/blogPosts/posts/20260401_EquipmentQualification_Part_I/EqQual1Model.mp4" type="video/mp4">
    There should have been a video here but your browser does not seem
    to support it.
</video>
<p><br><br></p>
<p><u><b>EXECUTION</b></u></p>
<video class="video-shortcode" preload="auto" controls>
    <source src="/blogPosts/posts/20260401_EquipmentQualification_Part_I/EqQual1Execution.mp4" type="video/mp4">
    There should have been a video here but your browser does not seem
    to support it.
</video>
<h3 id="final-thoughts">Final thoughts</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Equipment Qualification in MES ensures that all equipment, capabilities or recipes remain reliable, compliant, and ready for production. By structuring how qualification lots are assigned, executed, and verified, CM MES V11.3 helps maintain consistent equipment performance and reduces operational risk. It’s a simple but essential safeguard for any validated manufacturing environment.
<br><br>
<h3 id="author">Author</h3>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Hi! My name is José Romeu Bogas Gonçalves. 😉
<p>I&rsquo;ve been with Critical Manufacturing since 2018, starting out as an MES Consultant. In 2025 I stepped into the Advocate &amp; Architecture team. My role sits at the intersection of technology, communication, and strategy. Making sure solutions are technically sound and that everyone understands how to use or build them.</p>
<p>You can check me on <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/romeu-gon%C3%A7alves-63724113/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">LinkedIn</a></p>
</div>
<p>Skills: MES Consultant | System Testing | System Modeling | User Training | Content Creating</p>
<p>
<figure class="text-center">
  <img
    src="/blogPosts/contributors/Blogger_Romeu.jpg"
    alt="Romeu Gonçalves"
    title="Architecture &amp; Advocacy | MES"
  />
  <figcaption style="text-align: center">Architecture &amp; Advocacy | MES</figcaption>
</figure>

</p>
]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>